Burger v. BLAIR MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.

946 A.2d 638
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 1, 2008·No. 377 WAL 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Is an action for damages for the disclosure of confidential patient information an action for invasion of privacy for the purposes of the one year statute of limitations set forth in 42 Pa.C.S. 5523(1)?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burger v. BLAIR MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC., 946 A.2d 638 (Pa. 2008).

946 A.2d 638 (Burger v. BLAIR MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JULIA RIBAUDO SENIOR SERVICES v. Department of Public Welfare
946 A.2d 638 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)