Jules Hairstylists Of Maryland, Inc. v. United States

389 F.2d 389, 21 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 632, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8417
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 12, 1968·No. 11569·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

389 F.2d 389

JULES HAIRSTYLISTS OF MARYLAND, INC., a Maryland Corporation, and Jules Hairstylists, Inc., a District of Columbia Corporation, and Jules Hairstylists of Virginia, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Irving Machiz, appellees.

No. 11569.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued January 8, 1968.

Decided January 12, 1968.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; Edward S. Northrop, Judge.

Harry S. Shapiro, Baltimore, Md., for appellants.

Karl Schmeidler, Attorney, Department of Justice (Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Crombie J. D. Garrett, Attorneys, Department of Justice, and Stephen H. Sachs, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellees.

Before BOREMAN and WINTER, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm on the memorandum opinion of the district court.1

Affirmed.

Notes:

1

Jules Hairstylists of Maryland v. United States, 268 F.Supp. 511 (D.C.Md.1967)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jules Hairstylists Of Maryland, Inc. v. United States, 389 F.2d 389, 21 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 632, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8417 (4th Cir. 1968).

389 F.2d 389 (Jules Hairstylists Of Maryland, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hutchinson v. United States
677 F.2d 1322 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
California ex rel. Younger v. Blumenthal
457 F. Supp. 1309 (E.D. California, 1978)
Hamilton National Bank of Johnson City v. United States
367 F. Supp. 1110 (E.D. Tennessee, 1972)