Jules Hairstylists Of Maryland, Inc. v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Jules Hairstylists Of Maryland, Inc. v. United States

389 F.2d 389, 21 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 632, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8417

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 12, 1968

Docket11569

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 389 F.2d 389 (Jules Hairstylists Of Maryland, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jules Hairstylists Of Maryland, Inc. v. United States, 389 F.2d 389, 21 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 632, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8417 (4th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

389 F.2d 389

JULES HAIRSTYLISTS OF MARYLAND, INC., a Maryland Corporation, and Jules Hairstylists, Inc., a District of Columbia Corporation, and Jules Hairstylists of Virginia, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Irving Machiz, appellees.

No. 11569.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued January 8, 1968.

Decided January 12, 1968.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; Edward S. Northrop, Judge.

Harry S. Shapiro, Baltimore, Md., for appellants.

Karl Schmeidler, Attorney, Department of Justice (Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Crombie J. D. Garrett, Attorneys, Department of Justice, and Stephen H. Sachs, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellees.

Before BOREMAN and WINTER, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm on the memorandum opinion of the district court.1

Affirmed.

Notes:

1

Jules Hairstylists of Maryland v. United States, 268 F.Supp. 511 (D.C.Md.1967)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI