Judge of Probate v. Southard

62 N.H. 229
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1882·Published

Opinion

Mr. Southard being administrator of his wife's estate, the legal as well as the beneficial title of her personal property vested in him, subject to the payment of her debts. Laws 1846, c. 327, s. 7; Judge of Probate v. Chamberlain, 3 N.H. 129; Parsons v. Parsons, 9 N.H. 309, 321; Weeks v. Jewett, 45 N.H. 510; Atherton v. McQuesten, 46 N.H. 205. As the daughter has no interest in the estate, she cannot complain of the non-return of an inventory. Gookin v. Hoit, 3 N.H. 392.

Judgment for the defendants.

BLODGETT, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge of Probate v. Southard, 62 N.H. 229 (N.H. 1882).

62 N.H. 229 (Judge of Probate v. Southard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Farley
45 N.H. 505 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1864)
Atherton v. McQuesten
46 N.H. 205 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1865)
Judge of Probate v. Chamberlain
3 N.H. 129 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1824)
Gookin v. Hoit
3 N.H. 392 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1826)
Parsons v. Parsons
9 N.H. 309 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1838)