Judge of Probate v. Southard

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Judge of Probate v. Southard

62 N.H. 229

DecidedJune 5, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 62 N.H. 229 (Judge of Probate v. Southard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Judge of Probate v. Southard, 62 N.H. 229 (N.H. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Southard being administrator of his wife's estate, the legal as well as the beneficial title of her personal property vested in him, subject to the payment of her debts. Laws 1846, c. 327, s. 7; Judge of Probate v. Chamberlain, 3 N.H. 129; Parsons v. Parsons, 9 N.H. 309, 321; Weeks v. Jewett, 45 N.H. 510; Atherton v. McQuesten, 46 N.H. 205. As the daughter has no interest in the estate, she cannot complain of the non-return of an inventory. Gookin v. Hoit, 3 N.H. 392.

Judgment for the defendants.

BLODGETT, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Southard being administrator of his wife's estate, the legal as well as the beneficial title of her personal property vested in him, subject to the payment of her debts. Laws 1846, c. 327, s. 7; Judge of Probate v. Chamberlain, 3 N.H. 129; Parsons v. Parsons, 9 N.H. 309, 321; Weeks v. Jewett, 45 N.H. 510; Atherton v. McQuesten, 46 N.H. 205. As the daughter has no interest in the estate, she cannot complain of the non-return of an inventory. Gookin v. Hoit, 3 N.H. 392.

Judgment for the defendants.

BLODGETT, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 N.H. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judge-of-probate-v-southard-nh-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack