Juarez v. Windsor Rock Products, Inc.

106 P.3d 180, 197 Or. App. 622
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 16, 2005
Docket03C-15394 A123073
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 P.3d 180 (Juarez v. Windsor Rock Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Juarez v. Windsor Rock Products, Inc., 106 P.3d 180, 197 Or. App. 622 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

106 P.3d 180 (2005)
197 Or. App. 622

Ronald JUAREZ, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Felix Juarez; Dondi Juarez, individually; and Altagracia Renteiria, individually, Appellants,
v.
WINDSOR ROCK PRODUCTS, INC., an Oregon corporation, Respondent.

03C-15394; A123073.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted January 20, 2005.
Decided February 16, 2005.

*181 Meagan A. Flynn argued the cause for appellants. With her on the briefs was Preston Bunnell & Stone, LLP.

Bruce H. Orr, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James E. Bartels, and Meyer & Wyse LLP.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and BREWER, Chief Judge, and CENICEROS, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Kilminster v. Day Management Corp., 323 Or. 618, 919 P.2d 474 (1996).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Juarez v. Windsor Rock Products, Inc.
144 P.3d 211 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 P.3d 180, 197 Or. App. 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juarez-v-windsor-rock-products-inc-orctapp-2005.