Juanita Matilde Martinez v. Haas-Anderson Construction, Ltd., HAC Equipment, Ltd., Haas-Anderson Management, L.C. and Eleno Cardona Jr.
This text of Juanita Matilde Martinez v. Haas-Anderson Construction, Ltd., HAC Equipment, Ltd., Haas-Anderson Management, L.C. and Eleno Cardona Jr. (Juanita Matilde Martinez v. Haas-Anderson Construction, Ltd., HAC Equipment, Ltd., Haas-Anderson Management, L.C. and Eleno Cardona Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13-20-00567-CV
Juanita Matilde Martinez v. Haas-Anderson Construction, Ltd., HAC Equipment, Ltd., Haas-Anderson Management, L.C. and Eleno Cardona Jr.
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Nueces County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019CCV-61963-1
JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged
against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
December 16, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Juanita Matilde Martinez v. Haas-Anderson Construction, Ltd., HAC Equipment, Ltd., Haas-Anderson Management, L.C. and Eleno Cardona Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juanita-matilde-martinez-v-haas-anderson-construction-ltd-hac-texapp-2021.