J.S., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 1, 2021
Docket21-1923
StatusPublished

This text of J.S., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES (J.S., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J.S., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

J.S., the Father, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM, Appellees.

No. 4D21-1923

[December 1, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Luis Delgado, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2020-DP-000607.

Thomas J. Butler of Thomas Butler, P.A., Miami Beach, for appellant.

Andrew Feigenbaum, Appellate Counsel, Children's Legal Services, West Palm Beach, and Logan Bartholomew, Certified Legal Intern, Florida A&M University College of Law, Orlando, for appellee Department of Children and Families.

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd Weitz, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian ad Litem o/b/o J.N., J.S. & J.S.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur. WARNER, J., dissents with opinion.

WARNER, J., dissenting.

The trial court terminated the father’s rights to his sons, finding that DCF had established grounds for termination under section 39.806(1)(f) and (g), Florida Statutes (2020). I would hold that termination pursuant to section 39.806(1)(g) was not supported by the evidence. See A.J. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fams., 97 So. 3d 985 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). I would also hold that section 39.806(1)(f) is unconstitutional because it requires no proof of a nexus between the egregious conduct towards one child and the potential harm to the child’s siblings in order to terminate the parental rights to the child’s siblings. See V.S. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fams., 322 So. 3d 1153 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (Warner, J., dissenting).

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A.J. v. Department of Children & Families
97 So. 3d 985 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
J.S., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/js-the-father-v-department-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2021.