JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Phillips-Osuji
This text of 120 A.D.3d 1194 (JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Phillips-Osuji) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, nonparty Samuel Osuji appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated October 15, 2012, which denied his motion for leave to intervene as a defendant.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly denied the proposed intervenor’s motion for leave to intervene as a defendant. The proposed intervenor, the spouse of the defendant Christine Phillips-Osuji, was not, under the facts of this case, entitled to intervene as of right (see CPLR 1012; State St. Bank & Trust Co. v Calandro, 243 AD2d 705 [1997]; Arbor Natl. Mtge. v Goldsmith, 154 Misc 2d 853 [Sup Ct, Nassau County 1992]). Moreover, the denial of leave to intervene by permission was a provident exercise of the Supreme Court’s discretion (see CPLR 1013; Pappas v Pappas, 95 AD3d 1283 [2012]).
The proposed intervenor’s remaining contentions are not properly before this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 A.D.3d 1194, 991 N.Y.S.2d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jp-morgan-chase-bank-na-v-phillips-osuji-nyappdiv-2014.