Pappas v. Pappas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pappas v. Pappas

91 A.D.3d 737, 936 N.Y.2d 564

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 17, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 91 A.D.3d 737 (Pappas v. Pappas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pappas v. Pappas, 91 A.D.3d 737, 936 N.Y.2d 564 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the motion of the plaintiff wife for an award of an interim attorney’s fee (see Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879 [1987]; Prichep v Prichep, 52 AD3d 61 [2008]).

The defendant husband’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, A.P.J., Balkin, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the motion of the plaintiff wife for an award of an interim attorney’s fee (see Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879 [1987]; Prichep v Prichep, 52 AD3d 61 [2008]).

The defendant husband’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, A.P.J., Balkin, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A.D.3d 737, 936 N.Y.2d 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pappas-v-pappas-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack