Joy Maraio-Wilhoit v. Ronald Edwin Wilhoit

Court of Appeals of Texas

Joy Maraio-Wilhoit v. Ronald Edwin Wilhoit

DecidedFebruary 4, 2021

Docket11-18-00312-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Joy Maraio-Wilhoit v. Ronald Edwin Wilhoit (Joy Maraio-Wilhoit v. Ronald Edwin Wilhoit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joy Maraio-Wilhoit v. Ronald Edwin Wilhoit, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Joy Maraio-Wilhoit, * From the 318th District Court of Midland County, Trial Court No. FM61934.

Vs. No. 11-18-00312-CV * February 4, 2021

Ronald Edwin Wilhoit, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is modified as follows: (1) the phrase “subject to the following” in paragraph one of the “Attorney’s Fees” section of the final decree is stricken; (2) paragraphs 2 through 6 of the “Attorney’s Fees” section of the final decree are stricken; and (3) the final decree shall recite: “Save for the fees owed to Hal Brockett, Brockett & McNeel, LLP as provided in the MSA, each party shall be responsible for the payment of all attorney’s fees, expenses, and costs incurred by them as a result of their respective legal representation in this case.” The judgment of the trial court is affirmed as modified. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Joy Maraio-Wilhoit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Joy Maraio-Wilhoit, * From the 318th District Court of Midland County, Trial Court No. FM61934.

Vs. No. 11-18-00312-CV * February 4, 2021

Ronald Edwin Wilhoit, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is modified as follows: (1) the phrase “subject to the following” in paragraph one of the “Attorney’s Fees” section of the final decree is stricken; (2) paragraphs 2 through 6 of the “Attorney’s Fees” section of the final decree are stricken; and (3) the final decree shall recite: “Save for the fees owed to Hal Brockett, Brockett & McNeel, LLP as provided in the MSA, each party shall be responsible for the payment of all attorney’s fees, expenses, and costs incurred by them as a result of their respective legal representation in this case.” The judgment of the trial court is affirmed as modified. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Joy Maraio-Wilhoit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Joy Maraio-Wilhoit v. Ronald Edwin Wilhoit, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joy-maraio-wilhoit-v-ronald-edwin-wilhoit-texapp-2021.