Joy Barlow v. Thomas J. Morrison

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 16, 2019
DocketA19A2258
StatusPublished

This text of Joy Barlow v. Thomas J. Morrison (Joy Barlow v. Thomas J. Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joy Barlow v. Thomas J. Morrison, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ July 08, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A2258. JOY BARLOW v. THOMAS J. MORRISON et al.

Joy Barlow filed a medical malpractice action against several defendants. On January 11, 2019, the trial court granted summary judgment to defendants Thomas J. Morrison, M.D., and Polaris Spine & Neurosurgery Center P.C. f/k/a Peachtree Neurosurgery, P.C. The case proceeded against the remaining defendants, Justin G. Ford, M.D., and Northside Anesthesiology Consultants, LLC and was set for trial. On April 22, 2019, Barlow voluntarily dismissed her claims against the remaining defendants without prejudice. On May 8, 2019, she appealed from her voluntary dismissal. We lack jurisdiction. Barlow purports to appeal from her voluntary dismissal as a “final judgment” within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1). She also seeks review of the trial court’s partial grant of summary judgment on January 11, 2019. But “a voluntary dismissal is not a decision or judgment that a plaintiff may appeal.” Torres v. Elkin, 317 Ga. App. 135, 139 (1) (730 SE2d 518) (2012); accord Waye v. Continental Special Risks, 289 Ga. App. 82, 84 (656 SE2d 150) (2007); Studdard v. Satcher, Chick, Kapfer, Inc., 217 Ga. App. 1, 3 (456 SE2d 71) (1995). This is so because a voluntary dismissal is not a judgment or order by the trial court and because “one cannot complain of a judgment, order, or ruling that his own procedure or conduct procured or aided in causing.” Studdard, 217 Ga. App. at 2-3 (punctuation omitted). Moreover, a voluntary dismissal cannot be used as a vehicle for obtaining appellate review of rulings entered by the trial court more than 30 days from the filing of the notice of appeal. Waye, 289 Ga. App. at 84. For these reasons, this Court is without jurisdiction to entertain Barlow’s appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/08/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waye v. Continental Special Risks, Inc.
656 S.E.2d 150 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Studdard v. Satcher, Chick, Kapfer, Inc.
456 S.E.2d 71 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
Torres v. Elkin
730 S.E.2d 518 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joy Barlow v. Thomas J. Morrison, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joy-barlow-v-thomas-j-morrison-gactapp-2019.