Joshua Jacobs v. Huser Construction, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Joshua Jacobs v. Huser Construction, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 3003
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 12, 2013·No. 04-13-00211-CV·Published

Opinion

FILE COPY

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 12, 2013

No. 04-13-00211-CV

Joshua JACOBS, Appellant

v.

Ian FRAZAR d/b/a Frazar Steel Fab and Huser Construction Inc., Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. 12540B Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On April 12, 2013, Appellee filed a motion to supplement the clerk’s record with documents from the trial court record. The motion does not show that it was served on the trial court clerk. To ensure a document is properly included in the appellate record, Appellee “may by letter direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplement containing the omitted item.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1). Appellee’s motion is MOOT.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 12th day of April, 2013.

____________________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joshua Jacobs v. Huser Construction, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Joshua Jacobs v. Huser Construction, Inc. (Joshua Jacobs v. Huser Construction, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.