Joshua Jacobs v. Huser Construction, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Joshua Jacobs v. Huser Construction, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 3003
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 9, 2013·No. 04-13-00211-CV·Published

Opinion

Jf onrtlj Court of jj3>an Slittomo,

September 09. 2013

No. 04-13-0021 I-CV

Joshua Jacobs. Appellant

v.

[ [user Construction. Inc.. Appellee

Trial Court Case No. 12540B

O R I) K R

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and the majority of the judges have determined that orai argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. Al'P. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument arc denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on Tuesday, October 08. 2013. to the following panel: Chief Justice Stone. Justice Marion, and Justice Alvarez. All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 48.

Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. App. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of ibis order.

It is so ORDERED on Monday. September 09. 2013.

Catherine) Stone. Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHFRF.OF. I have hereunto set my hand and ttffixed the seal < court on this Monday. September 09. 2013.

trC-il h I' nolle. C erk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joshua Jacobs v. Huser Construction, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Joshua Jacobs v. Huser Construction, Inc. (Joshua Jacobs v. Huser Construction, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.