Joseph W. Hunter v. United States

338 F.2d 283, 119 U.S. App. D.C. 174, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4152
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedOctober 15, 1964
Docket17781_1
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 338 F.2d 283 (Joseph W. Hunter v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph W. Hunter v. United States, 338 F.2d 283, 119 U.S. App. D.C. 174, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4152 (D.C. Cir. 1964).

Opinions

Order

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant’s petitition for rehearing en banc, it is

Ordered by the court en banc that appellant’s aforesaid petition is denied.

[284]*284Circuit Judges Fahy and Washington did not participate in the foregoing order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Louis Joseph Marion Marvin Ives
504 F.2d 935 (Ninth Circuit, 1974)
Lee v. Alabama
291 F. Supp. 921 (M.D. Alabama, 1967)
State v. Bradley
433 P.2d 273 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Wilson
263 F. Supp. 528 (District of Columbia, 1966)
Mordecai v. United States
252 F. Supp. 694 (District of Columbia, 1966)
Joseph W. Hunter v. United States
338 F.2d 283 (D.C. Circuit, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
338 F.2d 283, 119 U.S. App. D.C. 174, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-w-hunter-v-united-states-cadc-1964.