Joseph v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

28 A.3d 867, 611 Pa. 479, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 3188
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 12, 2011·No. 19 WAP 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this day of August, 2011, the appeal is DISMISSED due to Appellant’s failure to file a brief. The Application for Summary Relief/Application for Stay is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, 28 A.3d 867, 611 Pa. 479, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 3188 (Pa. 2011).

28 A.3d 867 (Joseph v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION AND PAROLE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

M. Cook v. City of Philadelphia Civil Service Commission
201 A.3d 922 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2019)