Joseph De Luca v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury

D.C. Circuit

Joseph De Luca v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury

293 F.2d 852, 110 U.S. App. D.C. 375, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4269

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 8, 1961·No. 16213·Published·Cited by 29 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a civil service case, in which plaintiff-appellant seeks reinstatement to his former post in the Internal Revenue Service. We have considered the contentions advanced by appellant, but are satisfied he received all the procedural rights accorded him by statute and regulation. We find no error “cognizable within the scope of permissible review,” Hargett v. Summerfield, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 85, 88, 243 F.2d 29, 32, certiorari denied, 353 U.S. 970, 77 S.Ct. 1060, 1 L.Ed. 2d 1137 (1957). The order of the District Court, granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment, will accordingly be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a civil service case, in which plaintiff-appellant seeks reinstatement to his former post in the Internal Revenue Service. We have considered the contentions advanced by appellant, but are satisfied he received all the procedural rights accorded him by statute and regulation. We find no error “cognizable within the scope of permissible review,” Hargett v. Summerfield, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 85, 88, 243 F.2d 29, 32, certiorari denied, 353 U.S. 970, 77 S.Ct. 1060, 1 L.Ed. 2d 1137 (1957). The order of the District Court, granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment, will accordingly be

Affirmed.

Joseph De Luca v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury, 293 F.2d 852, 110 U.S. App. D.C. 375, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4269 (D.C. Cir. 1961).

Pincite

293 F.2d 852 (Joseph De Luca v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related