Joseph Daniel Walls v. Bremer, Warden

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION JOSEPH DANIEL WALLS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 5:25-cv-1808-LCB-HNJ ) BREMER, Warden, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER On June 10, 2026, U.S. Magistrate Judge Herman N. Johnson, Jr., issued a Report and Recommendation in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) recommending that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice as moot. (Doc. 18). No party has objected to the report and recommendation. If a party objects to a portion of a Magistrate Judge’s report or proposed findings or recommendations, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which the party has specifically objected. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). Any portions of a Magistrate Judge’s report that are unchallenged are reviewed for clear error. Haywood v. Green, 695 F.Supp.3d 1315, 1318 (N.D. Ala. Sept. 27, 2023). In its review, the district court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,” the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Having reviewed the proposed findings and recommendations for clear error, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 18) should be ACCEPTED and hereby ADOPTS it as the findings of the Court. The Court therefore DISMISSES this action without prejudice as moot. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. DONE and ORDERED this July 8, 2026.

LILES C. BURKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE