Joseph Constant v. Attorney Grievance Commission
This text of Joseph Constant v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Joseph Constant v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
January 5, 2017 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Stephen J. Markman 153609(19) Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein JOSEPH CONSTANT, Joan L. Larsen, Justices Plaintiff, SC: 153609 v AGC: 1770-15
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant. ________________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff’s motion to file an amended motion for reconsideration in excess of the page limitation is GRANTED. The amended motion for reconsideration submitted on December 24, 2016, is accepted for filing.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 5, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joseph Constant v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-constant-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2017.