Joseph Constant v. Attorney Grievance Commission

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 18, 2016·No. 153609·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

November 18, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

153609 & (14) Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

JOSEPH CONSTANT, Justices Plaintiff,

v SC: 153609 AGC: 1770-15

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to amend is GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 18, 2016

a1115 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph Constant v. Attorney Grievance Commission, (Mich. 2016).

Joseph Constant v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Joseph Constant v. Attorney Grievance Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.