JOSEPH CLINTON HILL, JR. v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ex. Rel., JEREMIAH HILL

Court of Appeals of Georgia

JOSEPH CLINTON HILL, JR. v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ex. Rel., JEREMIAH HILL

DecidedJanuary 22, 2026

DocketA26A0934

StatusPublished

This text of JOSEPH CLINTON HILL, JR. v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ex. Rel., JEREMIAH HILL (JOSEPH CLINTON HILL, JR. v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ex. Rel., JEREMIAH HILL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

JOSEPH CLINTON HILL, JR. v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ex. Rel., JEREMIAH HILL, (Ga. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 22, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26A0934. JOSEPH CLINTON HILL, JR. v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, EX. REL., JEREMIAH HILL et al.

The Superior Court of Toombs County entered an order finding Joseph Hill in contempt of his child support obligations. Hill then filed in the superior court a document titled “Petition for Writ of Prohibition” in which he expressed his wish for appellate relief. The superior court interpreted the filing as a notice of appeal and transmitted the record to this Court. The Georgia Department of Human Services (“the Department”) has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing that we lack jurisdiction. We agree with the Department. Appeals from judgments or orders in domestic relations cases, including orders “holding or declining to hold persons in contempt,” must be made by application for discretionary review. See OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(2), (b). See also Russo v. Manning, 252 Ga. 155, 156 (312 SE2d 319) (1984) (“A judgment of contempt regarding a domestic relations decree is appealable only by application for discretionary appeal.”). Unlike a notice of appeal, an application for discretionary review by the Court of Appeals must be filed in this Court and must comply with OCGA § 5-6-35 and Court of Appeals Rule 31. Thus, Hill’s filing in the superior court cannot be construed as an application for discretionary review. “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Hair Restoration Specialists v. State of Ga., 360 Ga. App. 901, 903 (862 SE2d 564) (2021). Hill’s failure to follow the requisite discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal. The Department’s motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED, and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/22/2026 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 22, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26A0934. JOSEPH CLINTON HILL, JR. v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, EX. REL., JEREMIAH HILL et al.

The Superior Court of Toombs County entered an order finding Joseph Hill in contempt of his child support obligations. Hill then filed in the superior court a document titled “Petition for Writ of Prohibition” in which he expressed his wish for appellate relief. The superior court interpreted the filing as a notice of appeal and transmitted the record to this Court. The Georgia Department of Human Services (“the Department”) has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing that we lack jurisdiction. We agree with the Department. Appeals from judgments or orders in domestic relations cases, including orders “holding or declining to hold persons in contempt,” must be made by application for discretionary review. See OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(2), (b). See also Russo v. Manning, 252 Ga. 155, 156 (312 SE2d 319) (1984) (“A judgment of contempt regarding a domestic relations decree is appealable only by application for discretionary appeal.”). Unlike a notice of appeal, an application for discretionary review by the Court of Appeals must be filed in this Court and must comply with OCGA § 5-6-35 and Court of Appeals Rule 31. Thus, Hill’s filing in the superior court cannot be construed as an application for discretionary review. “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Hair Restoration Specialists v. State of Ga., 360 Ga. App. 901, 903 (862 SE2d 564) (2021). Hill’s failure to follow the requisite discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal. The Department’s motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED, and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/22/2026 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

JOSEPH CLINTON HILL, JR. v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ex. Rel., JEREMIAH HILL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-clinton-hill-jr-v-the-georgia-department-of-human-services-ex-gactapp-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack