Jose Margarito Palacios// Rosa Barr, Ismael Samuel Palacios, Vicente Zenon Palacios, and Maria Andrea Morales v. Bonifacio Palacios, as Temporary Dependent Administrator of the Estate of Esequiel Palacios Esparza, Rosa Barr, Ismael Samuel Palacios, Vicente Zenon Palacios, and Maria Andrea Morales// Cross-Appellee, Jose Margarito Palacios
This text of Jose Margarito Palacios// Rosa Barr, Ismael Samuel Palacios, Vicente Zenon Palacios, and Maria Andrea Morales v. Bonifacio Palacios, as Temporary Dependent Administrator of the Estate of Esequiel Palacios Esparza, Rosa Barr, Ismael Samuel Palacios, Vicente Zenon Palacios, and Maria Andrea Morales// Cross-Appellee, Jose Margarito Palacios (Jose Margarito Palacios// Rosa Barr, Ismael Samuel Palacios, Vicente Zenon Palacios, and Maria Andrea Morales v. Bonifacio Palacios, as Temporary Dependent Administrator of the Estate of Esequiel Palacios Esparza, Rosa Barr, Ismael Samuel Palacios, Vicente Zenon Palacios, and Maria Andrea Morales// Cross-Appellee, Jose Margarito Palacios) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 17, 2024
NO. 03-23-00129-CV
Appellant, Jose Margarito Palacios// Cross-Appellants, Rosa Barr, Ismael Samuel Palacios, Vicente Zenon Palacios, and Maria Andrea Morales
v.
Appellees, Bonifacio Palacios, as Temporary Dependent Administrator of the Estate of Esequiel Palacios Esparza, Rosa Barr, Ismael Samuel Palacios, Vicente Zenon Palacios, and Maria Andrea Morales// Cross-Appellee, Jose Margarito Palacios
APPEAL FROM 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS
This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on February 24, 2023. Having
reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in
the trial court’s judgment in part. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s final judgment to
the extent it ordered that Jose Margarito Palacios take nothing on his counterclaim for
declaratory judgment, and reverses the judgment as to Intervenors’ claim for unjust enrichment,
and renders judgment that Intervenors take nothing on this claim. Each party shall bear their
own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jose Margarito Palacios// Rosa Barr, Ismael Samuel Palacios, Vicente Zenon Palacios, and Maria Andrea Morales v. Bonifacio Palacios, as Temporary Dependent Administrator of the Estate of Esequiel Palacios Esparza, Rosa Barr, Ismael Samuel Palacios, Vicente Zenon Palacios, and Maria Andrea Morales// Cross-Appellee, Jose Margarito Palacios, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-margarito-palacios-rosa-barr-ismael-samuel-palacios-vicente-zenon-texapp-2024.