Jose Luis Raya v. State of Florida

183 So. 3d 1120, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11723, 2015 WL 4641535

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

By order we granted rehearing and withdrew our opinion in Raya v. State, 2014 WL 4988391 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). Having now considered appellant’s pro se brief, we issue the following opinion.

Jose Luis Raya appeals the convictions and sentences imposed after he entered a plea of no contest to second degree murder and felonious possession of a firearm. After reviewing the record, we grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and we affirm the conviction and sentences. We find no merit to the claim raised in appellant’s pro se initial brief.

Nevertheless, we remand for the correction of a scrivener’s error in the written sentencing order for count 2. At sentencing, the court orally pronounced that the sentence in count 2 would run concurrently with the sentence imposed in count 1. However, the written sentencing order indicates that count 2 “shall run Consecutive to/Concurrent” the sentence in count 1. On remand, the trial court is directed to correct the written sentencing order so that it is consistent with the oral pronouncement. See Simmons v. State, 106 So.3d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (affirming and remanding for correction of a scrivener’s error in written judgment in an Anders appeal).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

DAMOORGIAN, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.