JAVIN ANTHONY OGLESBY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida

JAVIN ANTHONY OGLESBY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 22, 2020

Docket20-0402

StatusPublished

This text of JAVIN ANTHONY OGLESBY v. STATE OF FLORIDA (JAVIN ANTHONY OGLESBY v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

JAVIN ANTHONY OGLESBY v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

JAVIN ANTHONY OGLESBY, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Nos. 4D20-399, 4D20-400, 4D20-401, and 4D20-402

[July 22, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 562017CF000036A, 562017CF000231A, 562018CF001022A and 562018CF001245A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

GERBER, J.

We affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentences in all four cases referenced above. However, we remand for correction of scrivener’s errors in the written orders for lower tribunal case no. 562018CF001245A.

In that case, on counts 2 and 4-11 for dealing in stolen property, which were second-degree felonies under section 812.019(1), Florida Statutes (2018), the trial court orally pronounced the defendant would serve the maximum fifteen years on each count, to be served concurrently. On counts 3 and 12-19 for giving false information to a pawnbroker, which were third-degree felonies under section 539.001(8)(b)8.a., Florida Statutes (2018), the trial court orally pronounced the defendant would serve the maximum five years on each count, to be served concurrently.

However, the written orders for case no. 562018CF001245A incorrectly indicate the defendant was sentenced to five years each on counts 2 and 4-11 and fifteen years each on counts 3 and 12-19. Based on the foregoing, we remand with directions to correct the written orders in case no. 562018CF001245A to conform with the court’s oral pronouncement. See, e.g., Raya v. State, 183 So. 3d 1120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (affirming the convictions and sentences in an Anders appeal but remanding for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written sentencing order). The defendant need not be present for this ministerial action.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

JAVIN ANTHONY OGLESBY, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Nos. 4D20-399, 4D20-400, 4D20-401, and 4D20-402

[July 22, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 562017CF000036A, 562017CF000231A, 562018CF001022A and 562018CF001245A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

GERBER, J.

We affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentences in all four cases referenced above. However, we remand for correction of scrivener’s errors in the written orders for lower tribunal case no. 562018CF001245A.

In that case, on counts 2 and 4-11 for dealing in stolen property, which were second-degree felonies under section 812.019(1), Florida Statutes (2018), the trial court orally pronounced the defendant would serve the maximum fifteen years on each count, to be served concurrently. On counts 3 and 12-19 for giving false information to a pawnbroker, which were third-degree felonies under section 539.001(8)(b)8.a., Florida Statutes (2018), the trial court orally pronounced the defendant would serve the maximum five years on each count, to be served concurrently.

However, the written orders for case no. 562018CF001245A incorrectly indicate the defendant was sentenced to five years each on counts 2 and 4-11 and fifteen years each on counts 3 and 12-19. Based on the foregoing, we remand with directions to correct the written orders in case no. 562018CF001245A to conform with the court’s oral pronouncement. See, e.g., Raya v. State, 183 So. 3d 1120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (affirming the convictions and sentences in an Anders appeal but remanding for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written sentencing order). The defendant need not be present for this ministerial action.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

JAVIN ANTHONY OGLESBY v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/javin-anthony-oglesby-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack