Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. United States
385 U.S. 37
Opinion
The motion of Philip A. Ray et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. United States, 385 U.S. 37 (1967).
385 U.S. 37 (Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Live Concert Antitrust Litigation
247 F.R.D. 98 (C.D. California, 2007)
United States v. Gillette Co.
828 F. Supp. 78 (District of Columbia, 1993)
Haagen-Dazs Co. v. Double Rainbow Gourmet Ice Creams, Inc.
691 F. Supp. 1262 (N.D. California, 1988)
In Re Super Prem. Ice Cream Distrib. Antitrust Lit.
691 F. Supp. 1262 (N.D. California, 1988)
Casey v. Diet Center, Inc.
590 F. Supp. 1561 (N.D. California, 1984)
JBL Enterprises, Inc. v. Jhirmack Enterprises, Inc.
509 F. Supp. 357 (N.D. California, 1981)
Nifty Foods Corporation v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. And Pet Incorporated
614 F.2d 832 (Second Circuit, 1980)
Federal Trade Commission v. Atlantic Richfield Company and the Anaconda Company
549 F.2d 289 (Fourth Circuit, 1977)
United States v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.
430 F. Supp. 729 (D. Maryland, 1976)
United States v. Phillips Petroleum Company
367 F. Supp. 1226 (C.D. California, 1973)
Ricchetti v. Meister Brau, Inc.
431 F.2d 1211 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
Ricchetti v. Meister Brau
431 F.2d 1211 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)