Jorgensen v. Standard Oil Co.

178 Misc. 740, 36 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1942 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1791
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 30, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 178 Misc. 740 (Jorgensen v. Standard Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jorgensen v. Standard Oil Co., 178 Misc. 740, 36 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1942 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1791 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1942).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Section 170 of the Municipal Court Code does not authorize the taxation of disbursements incurred in resisting an application to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. Even if the section expressly permitted taxation of the item-in question, it would be unenforcible as an unauthorized restraint upon free access to the United States Supreme Court. (Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Larabee, 234 U. S. 459.) The cost of printing briefs may not even be taxed as a disbursement in the .United States Supreme Court (Ex Parte Hughes, 114 U. S. 548; American Trust Co. v. Speers Sands & Clay Works, 60 F. [2d] 994, 998).

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted.

All concur. . Present — Hammer, Shientag and Miller, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley
181 Cal. App. 3d 213 (California Court of Appeal, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 Misc. 740, 36 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1942 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jorgensen-v-standard-oil-co-nysupct-1942.