Jorden v. State
This text of 500 S.W.2d 117 (Jorden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION
This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of murder with malice. Trial was before the court on a plea of guilty and punishment was assessed at ten years.
Appellant’s sole contention is that he was not properly admonished by the trial court as to the consequences of his plea as required by Article 26.13, Vernon’s Ann.C.C. P.
The court admonished the appellant that the punishment for such offense is “ . . . confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections for not less than two years nor more than life . . . ”; whereas the statutory range under Article 1257, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., is actually “ . . . life or for any term of years not less than two.” It is the omission of the words “for any term of years” which appellant contends is violative of Article 26.-13, supra.
The admonishment, even though it does not follow the exact wording of the statute, was sufficient to inform appellant that the consequences of his plea could include a sentence of any term in excess of two years. The omission in the admonishment could not have misled him to his detriment.1 Valdez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W.2d 927.
No reversible error being shown, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
500 S.W.2d 117, 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jorden-v-state-texcrimapp-1973.