Jordan v. State

995 So. 2d 993, 2008 WL 4566974
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jordan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 950 So. 2d 442
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 2008·No. 1D08-2097·Published

Opinion

995 So.2d 993 (2008)

Thomas E. JORDAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D08-2097.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 15, 2008.
Rehearing Denied November 18, 2008.

Thomas E. Jordan, pro se, Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the trial court's summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the denial of the appellant's claim without comment. However, the trial court improperly included language banning the appellant from future pro se filings without giving the appellant notice and an opportunity to respond. See *994 Petty v. State, 926 So.2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

We therefore reverse the portion of the order banning the appellant from future pro se filings and remand for further consideration consistent with this opinion.

AFFIRMED in part, and REVERSED and REMANDED, in part.

KAHN, WEBSTER, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jordan v. State, 995 So. 2d 993, 2008 WL 4566974 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

995 So. 2d 993 (Jordan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Petty v. State
926 So. 2d 445 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Haynes v. State
995 So. 2d 993 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)