Jordan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jordan v. State

913 So. 2d 744, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17336, 2005 WL 2899486

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 4, 2005

DocketNo. 5D05-187

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 913 So. 2d 744 (Jordan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jordan v. State, 913 So. 2d 744, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17336, 2005 WL 2899486 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jordan appeals from an order denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), in which he asserts he was entitled to a new sentencing because the judge who sentenced him after a violation of probation hearing and revocation of his probation, was not the same judge who presided over his criminal trial and imposed his original sentence, and there was no showing of necessity, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.700.

We recently issued an opinion in Scott v. State, 909 So.2d 364 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), which addressed these issues and resolved them contrary to Jordan’s position. We find this case factually indistinguishable from Scott. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, C.J., SHARP, W„ J., and SEMENTO, L.J. Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI