Jordan v. Gonzales

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7999

AMOS HENRY JORDAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States of America,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-126-2-20AJ)

Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 14, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amos Henry Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Amos Henry Jordan, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of

the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Jordan v. Ashcroft, CA-04-126-2-20AJ (D.S.C.,

filed Oct. 29, 2004; entered Nov. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -