Jordan v. Gonzales

Fourth Circuit

Jordan v. Gonzales

133 F. App'x 892

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 14, 2005·No. No. 04-7999·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Amos Henry Jordan, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jordan v. Ashcroft, CA-04-126-2-20AJ (D.S.C., filed Oct. 29, 2004; entered Nov. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Amos Henry Jordan, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jordan v. Ashcroft, CA-04-126-2-20AJ (D.S.C., filed Oct. 29, 2004; entered Nov. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Jordan v. Gonzales, 133 F. App'x 892 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

133 F. App'x 892 (Jordan v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related