Jordan v. Gonzales
This text of Jordan v. Gonzales (Jordan v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7999
AMOS HENRY JORDAN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States of America,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-126-2-20AJ)
Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 14, 2005
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Amos Henry Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Amos Henry Jordan, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of
the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Jordan v. Ashcroft, CA-04-126-2-20AJ (D.S.C.,
filed Oct. 29, 2004; entered Nov. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jordan v. Gonzales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-gonzales-ca4-2005.