Jordan v. All Star Auto

• Court: District Court, District of Columbia
• Decided: January 25, 2023
• Docket: Civil Action No. 2023-0127
• Status: Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JAMES JORDAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 23-0127 (UNA) ) ALL STAR AUTO SALES, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on consideration of plaintiff’s application to proceed in

forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be

dismissed without prejudice.

The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth

generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under these statutes, federal jurisdiction is available

when a “federal question” is presented or when the parties are of diverse citizenship and the

amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. “For jurisdiction to exist under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, there

must be complete diversity between the parties, which is to say that the plaintiff may not be a

citizen of the same state as any defendant.” Bush v. Butler, 521 F. Supp. 2d 63, 71 (D.D.C.

2007) (citing Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S. 365, 373-74 (1978)). A party

seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts that bring the suit within the Court’s

jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a).

This complaint neither presents a federal question nor establishes diversity jurisdiction, as

all the parties appear to reside or conduct business in Laurel, Maryland, and the amount in

1 controversy does not meet the $75,000 threshold. Therefore, because subject matter jurisdiction

is wanting, the Court must dismiss this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).

An Order is issued separately.

DATE: January 25, 2023 /s/ CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER United States District Judge