Jones v. Wainwright
This text of Jones v. Wainwright (Jones v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) KEITH JONES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-1291 (BAH) ) WARDEN WAINWRIGHT, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff commenced this action under 48 U.S.C. § 1983 against Issac Fullwood,
Chairman of the U.S. Parole Commission, and Simon Wainwright, Warden of the D.C. Jail.
Compl. at 1, ECF No. 1. Both Defendants moved to dismiss the case. Fed. Def.’s Mot. to
Dismiss, ECF No. 13; Def. Simon Wainwright’s Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 18. The Court
ordered the Plaintiff to respond to Chairman Fullwood’s motion on or before February 25, 2011.
Order, ECF No. 16. The Court similarly ordered the Plaintiff to respond to Warden
Wainwright’s motion on or before March 25, 2011. Order, ECR No. 19. In both orders, the
Court warned the Plaintiff that failure to timely respond could result in the Defendants’ motions
being granted as conceded. Order at 2, ECF No. 14; Order at 1–2, ECF No. 19. To date,
Plaintiff has not filed a response to either motion. The Court will therefore grant both motions to
dismiss as conceded and dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See D.D.C.
LCvR 83.23. A separate order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion shall issue this date.
/s/Beryl A. Howell BERYL A. HOWELL DATE: May 2, 2010 United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jones v. Wainwright, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-wainwright-dcd-2011.