Jones v. Virginia

136 S. Ct. 1358, 194 L. Ed. 2d 340, 84 U.S.L.W. 3494, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 1708
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 7, 2016·No. No. 14–1248.·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Supreme Court of Virginia for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016).

Justice THOMAS, with whom Justice ALITO joins, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand in this case:

The Court has held the petition in this and many other cases pending the decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016). In holding this petition and now vacating and remanding the judgment below, the Court has not assessed whether petitioner's asserted entitlement to retroactive relief 'is properly presented in the case.' Id., at ----, 136 S.Ct. 718 (slip op., at 13). On remand, courts should understand that the Court's disposition of this petition does not reflect any view regarding petitioner's entitlement to relief. The Court's disposition does not, for example, address whether an adequate and independent state ground bars relief, whether petitioner forfeited or waived any entitlement to relief (by, for example, entering into a plea agreement waiving any entitlement to relief), or whether petitioner's sentence actually qualifies as a mandatory life without parole sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Virginia, 136 S. Ct. 1358, 194 L. Ed. 2d 340, 84 U.S.L.W. 3494, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 1708 (U.S. 2016).

136 S. Ct. 1358 (Jones v. Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Remill Mason v. State of Mississippi
235 So. 3d 129 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2017)
Jones v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia, 2017
Jason Clem v. Leslie Fleming
664 F. App'x 272 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)