Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Jones v. State

Jones v. State

100 S.W. 150, 51 Tex. Crim. 3, 1907 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 44
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 13, 1907·No. No. 3713.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

After conviction the court granted appellant’s motion for new trial, and set aside the judgment, awarding such new trial. Subsequently, the court set aside his judgment awarding a new trial, and sought to reinstate the judgment of cbnviction. Upon this error is assigned. Appellant’s contention is well taken. After a motion for new trial has been awarded appellant, the case stands as it originally stood, that is, for trial. This question was discussed in Mathis v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 316. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 100 S.W. 150, 51 Tex. Crim. 3, 1907 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 44 (Tex. 1907).

100 S.W. 150 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Awadelkariem v. State
974 S.W.2d 721 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Moore v. State
708 S.W.2d 484 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
English v. State
592 S.W.2d 949 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
People v. Thompson
347 N.E.2d 481 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)