Jones v. State

1919 OK CR 265, 183 P. 518, 16 Okla. Crim. 706, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 241
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 Okla. Crim. 217
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided September 10, 1919·No. No. A-3317.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in error, C. H. Jones and Mrs. C. H. Jones, were tried and convicted on an information charging that on the 12th day of September, 1917. they did keep and maintain a place at 106% East Third street, Oklahoma City, where intoxicating liquor was kept and stored for the purpose of selling, bartering, giving away, and otherwise furnishing the same .to others. In accordance with the verdicts, C. H. Jones was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a period of six months and to pay a fine of $500, and Mrs. C. H. Jones *707 was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50. From the judgments an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on April 11, 1918, a petition in error with case-made.

The proof on the part of the state is that W. B. Nichols, chief of police, and Dell Bruce and John Heep, policemefa. accompanied by Chas. B. Selby, county attorney, went to the defendants' place, and on the back porch found a sack containing 13 half pints of whisky; that the general reputation of the Jones' place was that of being a place where whisky was kept for sale, and where people congregated for the purpose of drinking same. There was also proof of sales. Mrs. Jones testified that she did not know who put the whisky there. The defendant C. H. Jones did not testify.

The only question presented by this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verd'ets. The credibility of the witnesses and the weight and value to be given their testimony is a question solely for the jury’s determination. After a careful examination of the evidence, we are not prepared to say that the jury was not warranted in finding the defendants guilty.

The judgments appealed from are therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 1919 OK CR 265, 183 P. 518, 16 Okla. Crim. 706, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 241 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

1919 OK CR 265 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.