Jones v. State

1919 OK CR 123, 178 P. 893, 15 Okla. Crim. 683, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 60
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 20, 1919
DocketNo. A-2984.
StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 123 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. State, 1919 OK CR 123, 178 P. 893, 15 Okla. Crim. 683, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 60 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Prank Jones, was convicted on a charge that he did feloniously keep a place in the town of Wilson, Carter county, with the intent and purpose then and there ana tnerem of selling intoxicating liquors, and was sentenced to serve a term of one year in the penitentiary and to pay a fine of two hundred dollars. To reverse the judgment he appeals.

In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which this prosecution was based was held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment appealed from is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proctor v. State
1918 OK CR 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK CR 123, 178 P. 893, 15 Okla. Crim. 683, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.