Jones v. State
Opinion
By consent the defendant was tried under two separate and distinct indictments at the same trial. A separate verdict of guilty and a separate judgment were rendered on each indictment. One motion for a new trial, based upon both verdicts, was made and overruled; and the defendant sued out one bill of exceptions, in which he seeks to have both of the judgments set aside. This is not allowable, and this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the bill of exceptions. Fillingame v. State, 27 Ga. App. 764 (109 S. T. 916), and cit.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
144 S.E. 145 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.