Jones v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Jones v. State

141 S.E. 216, 37 Ga. App. 632, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 539

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 10, 1928·No. 18586·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. “To ascertain whether a particular part of a charge, excepted to as expressing an opinion on the facts, is fairly liable to such exception, the whole charge, written and in the record, may be considered.” Nutzel v. State, 60 Ga. 264. Under this ruling and the facts of the instant case, the single ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial shows no cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

2. The general grounds of the motion for a new trial are not argued .or referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. “To ascertain whether a particular part of a charge, excepted to as expressing an opinion on the facts, is fairly liable to such exception, the whole charge, written and in the record, may be considered.” Nutzel v. State, 60 Ga. 264. Under this ruling and the facts of the instant case, the single ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial shows no cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

2. The general grounds of the motion for a new trial are not argued .or referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Jones v. State, 141 S.E. 216, 37 Ga. App. 632, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 539 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

141 S.E. 216 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related