Jones v. State

141 S.E. 216, 37 Ga. App. 632, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 539
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 10, 1928
Docket18586
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 141 S.E. 216 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. State, 141 S.E. 216, 37 Ga. App. 632, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 539 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. “To ascertain whether a particular part of a charge, excepted to as expressing an opinion on the facts, is fairly liable to such exception, the whole charge, written and in the record, may be considered.” Nutzel v. State, 60 Ga. 264. Under this ruling and the facts of the instant case, the single ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial shows no cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

2. The general grounds of the motion for a new trial are not argued .or referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Driggers v. State
180 S.E. 619 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Davis v. State
169 S.E. 203 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 S.E. 216, 37 Ga. App. 632, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-gactapp-1928.