Jones v. State
89 S.E. 342, 18 Ga. App. 8, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 70
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 Ga. App. 811 →
Opinions
The accused made no statement at the trial; the evidence demanded the verdict, and there was no reversible error of law. It is therefore unnecessary to consider in detail the grounds of the amend'ment to the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. State, 89 S.E. 342, 18 Ga. App. 8, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 70 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
89 S.E. 342 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pride v. State
54 S.E. 686 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Godbee v. State
81 S.E. 876 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)