Jones v. State

86 S.E. 738, 17 Ga. App. 329, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 391

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Ga. App. 133 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 29, 1915·No. 6750·Published

Opinion

Eboyles, J.

The evidence authorized the judgment of the judge of the city-court, who tried the case without a jury; and no error of law appears.

Judgment affirmed.

Russell, O. J., dissents.

Citations by counsel: Miley v. State, 118 Ga. 274; Clark’s Crim. L. 68; 1 Bishop’s Crim. L. 173, par. 302, sec. 3; Stern v. State, 53 Ga. 229; Reich v. State, 63 Ga. 616.

Joseph Law, O. B. Garlick, for plaintiff in error. Frank S. Burney, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eboyles, J.

The evidence authorized the judgment of the judge of the city-court, who tried the case without a jury; and no error of law appears.

Judgment affirmed.

Russell, O. J., dissents.

Citations by counsel: Miley v. State, 118 Ga. 274; Clark’s Crim. L. 68; 1 Bishop’s Crim. L. 173, par. 302, sec. 3; Stern v. State, 53 Ga. 229; Reich v. State, 63 Ga. 616.

Joseph Law, O. B. Garlick, for plaintiff in error. Frank S. Burney, solicitor, contra.

Jones v. State, 86 S.E. 738, 17 Ga. App. 329, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 391 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

86 S.E. 738 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Stern v. State

53 Ga. 229 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1874)

Reich v. State

63 Ga. 616 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1879)

Miley v. State

45 S.E. 245 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)

Opinion

Related