Jones v. State
61 S.E. 133, 4 Ga. App. 273, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 266
Opinion
1. Whether the explanation which the accused makes of his possession of property recently stolen is sufficient to rebut the inference of guilt arising from such possession is a question to he determined solely by the jury.
2. No error of law is complained of, and the verdict approved by the trial court will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. State, 61 S.E. 133, 4 Ga. App. 273, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 266 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).
61 S.E. 133 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Calandros
86 S.E.2d 242 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1955)