Jones v. State

890 So. 2d 537, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 60, 2005 WL 171327
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 815 So. 2d 772
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 7, 2005·No. No. 5D04-1091·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pled guilty to two counts of possession of a controlled substance and one count each of trespass, driving while license suspended and grand theft. He was adjudicated guilty and placed on probation for three years. The only issue on appeal is the propriety of imposing, over defense objection, special probation conditions prohibiting Appellant from using alcohol or entering bars. We agree with Appellant that the record fails to show the requisite connection between these conditions and the crimes of which Appellant was convicted. MacIntyre v. State, 625 So.2d 118 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Grate v. State, 623 So.2d 591 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

Special Conditions (b) and (j) are stricken. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

PLEUS, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 890 So. 2d 537, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 60, 2005 WL 171327 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

890 So. 2d 537 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grate v. State
623 So. 2d 591 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
MacIntyre v. State
625 So. 2d 118 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)