Jones v. State

774 So. 2d 32, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12304, 2000 WL 1409745
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 708 So. 2d 337
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 27, 2000·No. No. 2D99-4017·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arthur Jones challenges the trial court order denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Jones asserts that he was sentenced under an unconstitutional version of the sentencing guidelines. The trial court denied the motion, finding this court had not declared the 1995 sentencing guidelines unconstitutional in Heggs v. State, 718 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). The Florida Supreme Court recently held that the 1995 sentencing guidelines were unconstitutional. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). Jones alleges the date of the offense was February 9, 1996. Therefore, we reverse and remand for a reconsideration of Jones’ sentence. See Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and PARKER and CASANUEVA, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 774 So. 2d 32, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12304, 2000 WL 1409745 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

774 So. 2d 32 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heggs v. State
718 So. 2d 263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Smith v. State
761 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)