Jones v. State

705 So. 2d 148, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1368, 1998 WL 64030
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 658 So. 2d 122
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 1998·No. No. 97-1608·Published

Opinion

KARLAN, SANDY, Associate Judge.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal. Appellant was convicted of grand theft for stealing property from K-Mart. However, there was no testimony from a K-Mart employee that there were any items missing from inventory. Rather, the State’s circumstantial evidence was that the merchandise was found in Appellant’s car without any customer receipt. This circumstantial evidence was insufficient to negate Appellant’s reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla.1989). Accordingly, Appellant’s conviction is reversed.

REVERSED.

STONE, C.J., and PARIENTE, BARBARA J., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 705 So. 2d 148, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1368, 1998 WL 64030 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

705 So. 2d 148 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Law
559 So. 2d 187 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)