Jones v. State

651 So. 2d 832, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2808, 1995 WL 119081
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 606 So. 2d 709
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 1995·No. No. 94-2073·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The state confesses error in the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence dated June 27, 1994. As the state correctly concedes, the trial court erred by increasing the defendant’s sentence in Count II from fifteen years concurrent to the other counts, to seven years consecutive to Count I. See Seago v. State, 627 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Lane v. State, 627 So.2d 556 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

Accordingly, we reverse the consecutive sentence of seven years in Count II, with directions to the trial court to reinstate the defendant’s original sentence of fifteen years concurrent to the other counts.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 651 So. 2d 832, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2808, 1995 WL 119081 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

651 So. 2d 832 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lane v. State
627 So. 2d 556 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Seago v. State
627 So. 2d 1316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)