Jones v. State

765 So. 2d 942, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11031, 2000 WL 1225862
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 30, 2000·No. No. 4D00-2193·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the order of the trial court denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief alleging his right to be resentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines.

The Supreme Court of Florida has recently held the operative window period in which to challenge the sentencing guideline provisions amended by Chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, commenced on October 1, -1995, and ended oh May 24, 1997, see Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2000). We agree with Judge Altenbernd’s analysis in Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), on the need to remand such cases for a recalculation of the defendant’s sentences under the 1994 guidelines scoresheet.

We reverse the order denying 3.850 relief and remand for consideration of whether resentencing is required pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). See also Speed v. State, 764 So.2d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

STEVENSON, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 765 So. 2d 942, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11031, 2000 WL 1225862 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

765 So. 2d 942 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tapia-Ruano v. Alvarez
765 So. 2d 942 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)