Jones v. State
622 So. 2d 1024, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6766, 1993 WL 225634
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 570 So. 2d 433 →
Opinion
The issue presented in the instant case is indistinguishable from the question addressed in Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993), where the supreme court held that if a trial court imposes a term of probation on one offense consecutive to a term of imprisonment on another offense, it is error to not award credit for time served on the first offense when imposing the sentence after revocation of probation on the second offense. We therefore reverse and remand for the appropriate credit to be awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. State, 622 So. 2d 1024, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6766, 1993 WL 225634 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
622 So. 2d 1024 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tripp v. State
622 So. 2d 941 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)