Jones v. State

582 So. 2d 181, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7511, 1991 WL 134065
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 1991·No. No. 90-2919·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HERSEY, Judge.

We reverse appellant’s sentence of four years in prison followed by two years of community control as an upward departure from the sentencing guidelines not supported by written reasons. See State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla.), approving in part Betancourt v. State, 550 So.2d 1121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Mestas, 507 So.2d 587 (Fla.1987). Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the trial court did not realize that the sentence was a departure. Accordingly, on remand, the trial court shall either set forth valid reasons for departure or sentence appellant [182]*182within the guidelines. See Merritt v. State, 567 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 582 So. 2d 181, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7511, 1991 WL 134065 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

582 So. 2d 181 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reed v. State
681 So. 2d 913 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Williams v. State
591 So. 2d 295 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)