Jones v. State

538 So. 2d 154, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 515, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 848, 1989 WL 13143
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2313
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 22, 1989·No. No. 88-1925·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying appellant’s motion to suppress physical evidence and grant the public defender’s motion to withdraw as appellant’s counsel. This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a motion in the trial court on the following accounts:

1. To correct the record so as to reflect that appellant did in fact, plead nolo con-tendere and did not plead guilty. See Pickersgill v. State, 516 So.2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

2. To conduct an evidentiary hearing allowing appellant notice plus an opportunity to be heard prior to the assessment of costs against appellant. See Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988).

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 538 So. 2d 154, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 515, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 848, 1989 WL 13143 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

538 So. 2d 154 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mays v. State
519 So. 2d 618 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Pickersgill v. State
516 So. 2d 92 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)