Jones v. State
492 So. 2d 848, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1817, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11523
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 459 So. 2d 1068 →
Opinion
Since it appears from the record that appellant has shown sufficient cause, we treat the appeal, brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), as a petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking a belated appeal. State v. Meyer, 430 So.2d 440 (Fla.1983); Meeks v. State, 489 So.2d 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). However, having thoroughly reviewed the record, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, the conviction below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. State, 492 So. 2d 848, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1817, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11523 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
492 So. 2d 848 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Meyer
430 So. 2d 440 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Meeks v. State
489 So. 2d 135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)